MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W821636573

Common Prayer: A View from North of the 49th Parallel

2013· article· en· W821636573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Geoffrey Leggett

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican Theological Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrayerArchbishopWorshipContext (archaeology)LiturgyBaptismHistoryCommonwealthReligious studiesSociologyLawGenealogyTheologyPhilosophyClassicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although I have lived uninterruptedly in British Columbia longer than any other place in my life, I am not a native-born Canadian. I was born in England, raised in the United States, and emigrated to Canada in 1987. In some respects I am an embodiment of what is becoming the Canadian reality: an immigrant who has found the Canadian context to be life-giving and, if I may use the term, natural. But Canada is my home if not my native land because it is here that I have spent twenty-eight of the thirty-one years since my ordination to the transitional diaconate in June of 1981.We Canadians treasure our connections with Anglicans throughout the world yet we are consciously North American, valuing the wisdom of our neighbors to the south while, at the same time, valuing our Commonwealth ties. Perhaps it is these two characteristics that make me feel so at home here, the son of a mother from England and a father from the United States.So, what is about in Canada, eh?Re-visiting the SourcesIf one wants to know what is about common prayer in the Anglican tradition, a good place to start is the Prayer Book of 1549. Archbishop Cranmer used the Preface and a concluding editorial, Of Ceremonies Omitted or Retained, to articulate a number of principles which have shaped Anglican worship for the past four hundred and fifty years.1) Liturgy is the product of human activity and thus susceptible to decay and distortion: There was never anything by the wit of man so well devised, or so surely established, which (in continuance of time) hath not been corrupted: as (among other things) it may plainly appear by the prayers in the Church.12) Regular and thorough reading of the scriptures is a norm for Christian worship: [The ancient fathers] so ordered the matter, that all the whole Bible (or the greatest part thereof) should be read over once in the year, intending thereby . . . that the people (by daily hearing of holy scripture read in the Church) should continually profit more and more in the knowledge of God.23) Liturgy is to be conducted in the vernacular rather than a hieratic language: And moreover, . . . Paul would have such language spoken to the people in the church, as they might understand and have profit by hearing the same.34) Simplicity and clarity rather than complexity and obscurity is a characteristic of authentic worship : Moreover, the number and hardness of the rules called the pie, and the manifold changings of the service, was the cause, that to turn the book only, was so hard and intricate a matter, that many times, there was more business to find out what should be read, than to read it when it was found out.45) Worship should unite people of a culture: And where heretofore, there hath been great diversity in saying and singing in churches within this realm: some following Salisbury use, some Hereford use, some the use of Bangor, some of York, and some of Lincoln: Now from henceforth, all the whole realm shall have but one use.56) Bishops are called to exercise pastoral stewardship of the liturgical life of their dioceses·. And forsomuch as nothing can, almost, be so plainly set forth, but doubts may rise in the use and practicing of the same: . . . the parties that so doubt, or diversely take anything, shall always resort to the Bishop of the Diocese, who by his discretion shall take order for the quieting and appeasing of the same: so that the same order be not contrary to anything contained in this book.67) English is not a privileged liturgical language; if the people understand another language, then it is suitable for worship (see number 3 above): Though it be appointed in the afore written preface, that all things shall be read and sung in the church, in the English tongue, to the end that the congregation may be thereby edified: yet it is not meant, but when men say Matins and Evensong privately, they may say the same in any language that they themselves do understand. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0370.027
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnglican Theological ReviewSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207