Eva Darias-Beautell, Ed.: Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts: Narratives of English Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eva Darias-Beautell, ed. Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts: Narratives of English Canada. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2012. 243 pp. Black and White Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $85.00 hc. This edited collection of essays derives from an international research project funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education with the participation of Canadian literature specialists from Spain, Canada, and the UK. The project explores innovative approaches the cultural and literary contexts of English Canada over the last forty years (2). These approaches include multiculturalism, environmentalism, cultural studies, queer theory, feminism, and post-colonialism. Each essay handles different set of questions, which, taken together, offer, in the editor's words, a tapestry of approaches that Penelopian process of simultaneous dismantling and reconstruction of the Canadian (3). Penelope in Homer's Odyssey put off her suitors during her husband's long absence by daily weaving shroud, which she dismantled each night, so that her task was never finished. This loosely deconstructive approach, here described as Penelopian, in its oscillation between present and past, memory and forgetting, presence and absence, lends itself framing within the perspectives set by Derridean hauntology (6), thus explaining the book's evocative title: Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts. Eight essays follow the editor's overview, with the final essay on Criticism and Indigenous Literature in the by Michele Lacombe, doing double duty as conclusion that points the need for further rethinking. Lacombe follows indigenous educational theorists in arguing that [T]he university has crucial role play in that complex process of epistemological transformation for which indigenous writers are calling (221). This fine essay focusses on literary history, criticism, and fiction by Indigenous writers in the 1990s, discussing work by wide range of indigenous creators. In her introduction, the editor notes that this final essay is designed talk back the first, by Howells, acting as Derridean supplement it (13-14). Coral Ann Howell's opening essay, Rewriting Tradition: Literature, History, and Changing Narratives in English Canada since the 1970s, provides the book with its time frame, useful chronological survey, and thoughtful analysis of the ways in which Canadian literary histories and critical introductions, including her own important work, have addressed the challenge of how to situate the diversity of the contemporary Canadian literary scene (20). The rest of the book addresses dimensions of that diversity, celebrated here as unruly in relation the kinds of white civility critiqued by Daniel Coleman in his 2006 White Civility: The Literary Project of English Canada, and considered within contemporary preoccupations with immigration, ethnicity, race, and urbanism. Bookended by these wide-ranging introductions different ways of approaching tradition and thinking about Canadian history and national identity in globalizing times are six essays that consider dimensions of Asian Canadian Studies (Smaro Kamboureli); mixed race subjectivity (Ana Maria Fraile); speculative fantasy (Belen Martin-Lucas); Vancouver's urban imaginary (Eva Darias-Beautell); Jane Rule's queer fictions (Richard Cavell); and confessional historical fiction (Maria Jesus Hernaez Lerena). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».