MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W822399037

Eva Darias-Beautell, Ed.: Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts: Narratives of English Canada

2014· article· en· W822399037 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Diana Brydon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerNarrativeCriticismFraming (construction)HistoryIndigenousSociologyArt historyLiteratureMedia studiesGender studiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eva Darias-Beautell, ed. Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts: Narratives of English Canada. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2012. 243 pp. Black and White Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $85.00 hc. This edited collection of essays derives from an international research project funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education with the participation of Canadian literature specialists from Spain, Canada, and the UK. The project explores innovative approaches the cultural and literary contexts of English Canada over the last forty years (2). These approaches include multiculturalism, environmentalism, cultural studies, queer theory, feminism, and post-colonialism. Each essay handles different set of questions, which, taken together, offer, in the editor's words, a tapestry of approaches that Penelopian process of simultaneous dismantling and reconstruction of the Canadian (3). Penelope in Homer's Odyssey put off her suitors during her husband's long absence by daily weaving shroud, which she dismantled each night, so that her task was never finished. This loosely deconstructive approach, here described as Penelopian, in its oscillation between present and past, memory and forgetting, presence and absence, lends itself framing within the perspectives set by Derridean hauntology (6), thus explaining the book's evocative title: Unruly Penelopes and the Ghosts. Eight essays follow the editor's overview, with the final essay on Criticism and Indigenous Literature in the by Michele Lacombe, doing double duty as conclusion that points the need for further rethinking. Lacombe follows indigenous educational theorists in arguing that [T]he university has crucial role play in that complex process of epistemological transformation for which indigenous writers are calling (221). This fine essay focusses on literary history, criticism, and fiction by Indigenous writers in the 1990s, discussing work by wide range of indigenous creators. In her introduction, the editor notes that this final essay is designed talk back the first, by Howells, acting as Derridean supplement it (13-14). Coral Ann Howell's opening essay, Rewriting Tradition: Literature, History, and Changing Narratives in English Canada since the 1970s, provides the book with its time frame, useful chronological survey, and thoughtful analysis of the ways in which Canadian literary histories and critical introductions, including her own important work, have addressed the challenge of how to situate the diversity of the contemporary Canadian literary scene (20). The rest of the book addresses dimensions of that diversity, celebrated here as unruly in relation the kinds of white civility critiqued by Daniel Coleman in his 2006 White Civility: The Literary Project of English Canada, and considered within contemporary preoccupations with immigration, ethnicity, race, and urbanism. Bookended by these wide-ranging introductions different ways of approaching tradition and thinking about Canadian history and national identity in globalizing times are six essays that consider dimensions of Asian Canadian Studies (Smaro Kamboureli); mixed race subjectivity (Ana Maria Fraile); speculative fantasy (Belen Martin-Lucas); Vancouver's urban imaginary (Eva Darias-Beautell); Jane Rule's queer fictions (Richard Cavell); and confessional historical fiction (Maria Jesus Hernaez Lerena). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207