Notice bibliographique
Résumé
David Loewenstein and Paul Stevens, eds, Early Modern Nationalism and Milton's England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008). xii+470pp. ISBN 978 0 8020 8935 9.As suggested by its title, this collection of fourteen essays offers a rich historical and theoretical exploration of nationalism during the lengthy, revolutionary period in which Milton wrote and published his poetry and prose. Milton wrote at a time when, to cite Benedict Anderson, 'the automatic legitimacy of sacral monarchy began its slow decline in Western Europe'.1 'In 1649', Anderson adds, 'Charles Stuart was beheaded in the first of the modern world's revolutions, and during the 1650s one of the most important European states was ruled by a plebeian Protector rather than a king'.2 The now-familiar narrative, perhaps most eloquently expressed by Richard Helgerson (to whom this volume is dedicated), is that in the wake of monarchy's decline national communities came to be imagined otherwise: as 'boundary-oriented and horizontal' rather than 'centripetal and hierarchical'.3 Anderson, however, locates the rise of nationalism not in the seventeenth century but the eighteenth, when religious modes of thought began to wane. This volume, heavily indebted to Anderson, but also to Helgerson's groundbreaking work on the Elizabethan writing of England, firmly situates the rise of nationalism in an earlier period; moreover, it places 'John Milton, Englishman' at the centre of seventeenth-century articulations of the nation. Loewenstein's essay, for example, challenges Anderson's belief that nationalism necessarily surfaces as religious modes of thought decline. For Loewenstein, 'a newly emergent Protestant nationalism', not to mention 'proto-republican nationalism' (p. 30), provides the context for 'the ways in which Milton attempted to imagine, forge, and reconstruct the godly nation' (pp. 26, 27). Andrew Escobedo, too, takes aim at Anderson's separation of nationalism and religious modes of thought, arguing that 'Milton defines the nation as an intimate, spiritual community in opposition to the coercive visibility of the state' (p. 192). Again and again, these essays reveal just how integral religious discourse is to early modern nationalism. Together, these essays offer new and fresh perspectives on not just Milton and his cultural moment but also nationalism and national identity.Whilst Milton is the centrepiece, there is ample space in 'Milton's England' for other contemporary voices as well as later seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century writers, and this inclusion of other writers gives the volume an impressive and productive range. Warren Cherniak's essay, for example, examines Milton's writing on Cromwell alongside Marvell's and Waller's, and it also cites fellow republicans, including Nedham, Harrington and Sexby. John Kerrigan's essay situates the writings of both Milton and Marvell within a wide political framework that includes Scotland and Ireland as well as the Netherlands; Achsah Guibbory's attention to fast sermons explores the ways in which early modern conceptions of the English nation drew upon the Old Testament; Victoria Kahn's examination of Milton's 'disappointed nationalism' incorporates Filmer and Grotius; Mary Nyquist divides her essay between Milton and Locke; and Nicholas von Maltzahn's consideration of the national reception of Milton takes the reader beyond the seventeenth century and into the eighteenth. One of this volume's many strengths, therefore, is its placement of Milton amongst other contemporary writers and other key discourses - civic, ethnic, literary, political, religious - in the period. The result is a volume that situates the rise of early modern nationalism in an emergent, energetic and contested public sphere.Another of this volume's strengths is its refusal to pigeonhole Milton's nationalism. As stated, many of the contributors are informed by Anderson's reflections on nationalism. Some, however, take issue with the notion that the seventeenth century gave rise to nationalism as we understand that term. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».