MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W869046765

Early Modern Nationalism and Milton's England

2014· article· en· W869046765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher Ivic

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly modern literary studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalismPoetryMonarchyLegitimacyNarrativeHistoryPeriod (music)ClassicsLiteratureArtPoliticsLawAestheticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

David Loewenstein and Paul Stevens, eds, Early Modern Nationalism and Milton's England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008). xii+470pp. ISBN 978 0 8020 8935 9.As suggested by its title, this collection of fourteen essays offers a rich historical and theoretical exploration of nationalism during the lengthy, revolutionary period in which Milton wrote and published his poetry and prose. Milton wrote at a time when, to cite Benedict Anderson, 'the automatic legitimacy of sacral monarchy began its slow decline in Western Europe'.1 'In 1649', Anderson adds, 'Charles Stuart was beheaded in the first of the modern world's revolutions, and during the 1650s one of the most important European states was ruled by a plebeian Protector rather than a king'.2 The now-familiar narrative, perhaps most eloquently expressed by Richard Helgerson (to whom this volume is dedicated), is that in the wake of monarchy's decline national communities came to be imagined otherwise: as 'boundary-oriented and horizontal' rather than 'centripetal and hierarchical'.3 Anderson, however, locates the rise of nationalism not in the seventeenth century but the eighteenth, when religious modes of thought began to wane. This volume, heavily indebted to Anderson, but also to Helgerson's groundbreaking work on the Elizabethan writing of England, firmly situates the rise of nationalism in an earlier period; moreover, it places 'John Milton, Englishman' at the centre of seventeenth-century articulations of the nation. Loewenstein's essay, for example, challenges Anderson's belief that nationalism necessarily surfaces as religious modes of thought decline. For Loewenstein, 'a newly emergent Protestant nationalism', not to mention 'proto-republican nationalism' (p. 30), provides the context for 'the ways in which Milton attempted to imagine, forge, and reconstruct the godly nation' (pp. 26, 27). Andrew Escobedo, too, takes aim at Anderson's separation of nationalism and religious modes of thought, arguing that 'Milton defines the nation as an intimate, spiritual community in opposition to the coercive visibility of the state' (p. 192). Again and again, these essays reveal just how integral religious discourse is to early modern nationalism. Together, these essays offer new and fresh perspectives on not just Milton and his cultural moment but also nationalism and national identity.Whilst Milton is the centrepiece, there is ample space in 'Milton's England' for other contemporary voices as well as later seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century writers, and this inclusion of other writers gives the volume an impressive and productive range. Warren Cherniak's essay, for example, examines Milton's writing on Cromwell alongside Marvell's and Waller's, and it also cites fellow republicans, including Nedham, Harrington and Sexby. John Kerrigan's essay situates the writings of both Milton and Marvell within a wide political framework that includes Scotland and Ireland as well as the Netherlands; Achsah Guibbory's attention to fast sermons explores the ways in which early modern conceptions of the English nation drew upon the Old Testament; Victoria Kahn's examination of Milton's 'disappointed nationalism' incorporates Filmer and Grotius; Mary Nyquist divides her essay between Milton and Locke; and Nicholas von Maltzahn's consideration of the national reception of Milton takes the reader beyond the seventeenth century and into the eighteenth. One of this volume's many strengths, therefore, is its placement of Milton amongst other contemporary writers and other key discourses - civic, ethnic, literary, political, religious - in the period. The result is a volume that situates the rise of early modern nationalism in an emergent, energetic and contested public sphere.Another of this volume's strengths is its refusal to pigeonhole Milton's nationalism. As stated, many of the contributors are informed by Anderson's reflections on nationalism. Some, however, take issue with the notion that the seventeenth century gave rise to nationalism as we understand that term. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly modern literary studiesSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207