THE PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT.The social life has always created multiple problems for members of society, especially administrative ones. The needs they expressed led to existence of public function and clerks that would participate, in an integrated environment, to their fulfillment and completion of general objective of administrative system. The human community would not have progressed if they had not created an entire social organism, empowered by personnel assigned in different positions established during time.Keywords: corruption; public administration; public clerks1. General Overview of Corruption Phenomenon from an International and National Point of ViewCorruption, in a simple definition, represents abuse of power, usually with a clear purpose - to obtain personal gains, or in advantage of a group of interests.1Corruption can have as a starting point estates and social levels which one involved would like either to keep or to magnify, motivated by desire to maintain or magnify power, or by simple belief that these would guarantee a well being state.2 Law, by its multiple disciplines, cannot study concept of corruption starting from empiric levelThis phenomenon, in specialists' opinion is like a prism with multiple faces, which can be seen from different angles, respectively from point of view of political sciences or economical sciences, penal or civil law or as a social phenomenon.3Treated like a social phenomenon, corruption is present in all societies, without taking into account development level of each state, adapting to specific conditions, and being able to jeopardize essence of state by consequences it could trigger.Corruption is a threaten to democracy, supremacy of law, social equity and justice, it damages principles of an efficient administration and market economy and also jeopardizes stability of state institutions.4It is difficult to define exactly concept of corruption, as it can comprise different approaches, depending on social and economic reality from each state. In national reports presented by France and Hungary, during International Congress of Penal Law from Beijing from September 2004, definition of corruption is a determined one, restricted to exchange area between an unwanted advantage on one hand and fulfillment or not fulfillment of an act which is a part of job responsibilities from public or private sector.5With a few thousands of years old history, starting from Antiquity, corruption has represented one of worse behavior models, but at same time, one of most common within official clerks of chosen representatives of community. In last century, it also comprises behavior of people from private sector. The interest and concern regarding this phenomenon increased and there have been reactions nationally and internationally.This scourge of corruption damages normal development of economies, goes against fundamental rights, transferring financial resources to sectors that present interest for ones involved.In Professor Silvio Wasibord's opinion, professor of communication in Rutgers University, opinion expressed in Globe and Mail, Toronto, December 19, 1995: the phenomenon of corruption if visible rather due to new political and media conditions, than due to fact that governments from certain countries are more corrupt than ones before them.6The General Assembly of United Nations approached for first time - in 1975, by resolution 3514 - issue related to corrupt practices met in international commercial transaction, and through this, a series of new measures has been taken by international administration regarding this issue.In Romania, phenomenon of corruption is not new, it does not characterize social and economic relations after 1989, but it also existed during communist regime, being in fact a continuation of it, with expansionist tendencies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».