Jacques A. Hagenaars and Allan L. McCutcheon, Eds. Applied Latent Class Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cambridge University Press, 2002, 454 pp. Latent class models can provide a useful summary of data for which an observed set of categorical variables are highly related and represent some underlying concept. In their basic form these models are the categorical data analogues to factor analysis and structural equation modeling with latent variables. The possible applications of such models in the social sciences are numerous. One example would be using a set of categorically scored questionnaire items to group respondents according to various personality types. In this case, we would assume that the underlying personality type has caused responses to the various questions. Although latent class models were first used several decades ago, they are still not commonly applied, perhaps largely because they are not widely understood. Applied Latent Class Analysis, an edited volume that includes contributions from some of the leading researchers in the field, could help fill some of this gap in knowledge. Applied Latent Class Analysis is an outstanding book that demonstrates the potential uses of latent class models. Just as importantly, it provides insight into some recent innovations with respect to these models. The editors of the book, Jacques Hagenaars (Tilburg University) and Allan McCutcheon (Gallup Research Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln), are experts in the field who have assembled a truly first-rate set of articles. Reflecting the major uses of these models, the book is divided into four sections: (1) introduction, (2) classification and measurement, (3) causal analysis and dynamic models, and (4) unobserved heterogeneity and nonresponse. Each of these sections contains insightful chapters. The first section of the book contains chapters by McCutcheon and Leo Goodman. Goodman's chapter gives a good overview of latent variable models. Using examples that will be familiar to most social scientists, it provides an interesting history of the models and how they are related to similar models. McCutcheon's chapter is a very good introduction to the standard latent class model. Both of these chapters should prove helpful to a newcomer to these models. The second section discusses more specifically how latent variables can be seen as unobserved constructs represented by observed variables. Various ways of specifying the underlying variables--whether they are nominal, ordered or interval level variables--are discussed. We learn from Vermunt and Magdison in chapter three that models assuming a nominal latent variable have a strong similarity to some cluster analysis techniques. Chapter five, by Marcel Croon, is particularly insightful in its discussion of ordered latent class models as they can be applied to rating scales. The third section on causal analysis is perhaps the most useful. In chapter eight, Dayton and Macready describe blocking models, which are effective in determining the influence of continuous and categorical variables on the probability of observations belonging to particular latent classes. These models are simply adaptations of the standard logit model. Hagenaars extends this idea further to show how loglinear or logit models can be used to handle systematic measurement errors. These models parallel structural equation models with latent continuous variables. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,028 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».