MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W8891338

Jacques A. Hagenaars and Allan L. McCutcheon, Eds. Applied Latent Class Analysis

2003· article· en· W8891338 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Andersen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCategorical variableLatent class modelLatent variableClass (philosophy)Field (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Computer sciencePsychologyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cambridge University Press, 2002, 454 pp. Latent class models can provide a useful summary of data for which an observed set of categorical variables are highly related and represent some underlying concept. In their basic form these models are the categorical data analogues to factor analysis and structural equation modeling with latent variables. The possible applications of such models in the social sciences are numerous. One example would be using a set of categorically scored questionnaire items to group respondents according to various personality types. In this case, we would assume that the underlying personality type has caused responses to the various questions. Although latent class models were first used several decades ago, they are still not commonly applied, perhaps largely because they are not widely understood. Applied Latent Class Analysis, an edited volume that includes contributions from some of the leading researchers in the field, could help fill some of this gap in knowledge. Applied Latent Class Analysis is an outstanding book that demonstrates the potential uses of latent class models. Just as importantly, it provides insight into some recent innovations with respect to these models. The editors of the book, Jacques Hagenaars (Tilburg University) and Allan McCutcheon (Gallup Research Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln), are experts in the field who have assembled a truly first-rate set of articles. Reflecting the major uses of these models, the book is divided into four sections: (1) introduction, (2) classification and measurement, (3) causal analysis and dynamic models, and (4) unobserved heterogeneity and nonresponse. Each of these sections contains insightful chapters. The first section of the book contains chapters by McCutcheon and Leo Goodman. Goodman's chapter gives a good overview of latent variable models. Using examples that will be familiar to most social scientists, it provides an interesting history of the models and how they are related to similar models. McCutcheon's chapter is a very good introduction to the standard latent class model. Both of these chapters should prove helpful to a newcomer to these models. The second section discusses more specifically how latent variables can be seen as unobserved constructs represented by observed variables. Various ways of specifying the underlying variables--whether they are nominal, ordered or interval level variables--are discussed. We learn from Vermunt and Magdison in chapter three that models assuming a nominal latent variable have a strong similarity to some cluster analysis techniques. Chapter five, by Marcel Croon, is particularly insightful in its discussion of ordered latent class models as they can be applied to rating scales. The third section on causal analysis is perhaps the most useful. In chapter eight, Dayton and Macready describe blocking models, which are effective in determining the influence of continuous and categorical variables on the probability of observations belonging to particular latent classes. These models are simply adaptations of the standard logit model. Hagenaars extends this idea further to show how loglinear or logit models can be used to handle systematic measurement errors. These models parallel structural equation models with latent continuous variables. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicAdvanced Statistical Modeling TechniquesFrench-language works237,207