Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paramount's Rise and Fall: The Roots and History of Paramount Records, 2nd edition. By Alex van der Tuuk. Denver, CO: Mainspring Press, 2012. ISBN 0-98520-042-8 (paperback). $39 While reviewing the hardcover first edition of Alex van der Tuuk's Paramount's Rise and Fall: A History of the Wisconsin Chair Company and its Recording Activities for the ARSC Journal eight years ago (2005;36(1):100-102), I thought it was remarkable because it told the story of Paramount Records from the perspective of its parent company the New York Recorded Laboratories, and its grandparent company the Wisconsin Chair Company. Previous writers, who I will mention later, had focused on the recording producers, scouts, and artists. For his revised, expanded, and newly subtitled edition, van der Tuuk has reinforced his distinctive perspective on this firm by adding new information about Wisconsin Chair. Paramount collectors will want to buy this new version, while the fans of pre-1942 blues who had missed out on the first edition should take their opportunities to buy this one. (For its 2004 Awards, ARSC recognized the first edition as a nominee in the category of Best Research in Record Labels or Manufacturers.) Throughout its 15-year activity Paramount Records was a crass operation. In the eyes of grandparent company Wisconsin Chair, 78-rpm records ranked no higher than its other subsidiary companies in real estate, mining, oil, and natural gas. In the overall business scheme, the records were loss-leaders, serving as incentives for customers to buy the phonographs housed in cabinets built by Wisconsin Chair. Yet at the height of Paramount's sales during the 1920s, more money was made from the records than from the cabinets. What distinguished Paramount from the other record labels of the 1920s were its rosters of blues and black sacred musicians. Through the mid-1920s, the African American scout and producer Mayo Williams shepherded to Paramount the cream of musicians playing in Chicago, whether on the T.O.B.A. circuit, or in local venues like the Monogram Theater. Among the very best of this period were Ethel Waters, Alberta Hunter, Ma Rainey, Joe Oliver with Louis Armstrong, and Lovie Austin and her Blues Serenaders. Wisconsin Chair also maintained offices for its New York Recording Laboratories in New York, Port Washington WI, and Washington DC, and it made frequent use of the Gennett recording facility in Richmond, Indiana. By and in 1929, Paramount's circumstances were changing drastically: Williams left, his work taken over by Arthur Laibley; male rural singers like Blind Lemon Jefferson were outselling the female urban singers; and Wisconsin Chair opened its own recording studio on its Grafton, WI premises. While legendary now among record collectors and blues fans, the last 3 years of recording (1930-1932) were at the time the most desperate for Paramount, who was trying to see if the names of southern artists like Geechie Wiley and King Solomon Hill sounded exotic enough to the public to generate one more hit. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».