Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paramount's Rise and Fall: The Roots and History of Paramount Records, 2nd edition. By Alex van der Tuuk. Denver, CO: Mainspring Press, 2012. ISBN 0-98520-042-8 (paperback). $39 While reviewing the hardcover first edition of Alex van der Tuuk's Paramount's Rise and Fall: A History of the Wisconsin Chair Company and its Recording Activities for the ARSC Journal eight years ago (2005;36(1):100-102), I thought it was remarkable because it told the story of Paramount Records from the perspective of its parent company the New York Recorded Laboratories, and its grandparent company the Wisconsin Chair Company. Previous writers, who I will mention later, had focused on the recording producers, scouts, and artists. For his revised, expanded, and newly subtitled edition, van der Tuuk has reinforced his distinctive perspective on this firm by adding new information about Wisconsin Chair. Paramount collectors will want to buy this new version, while the fans of pre-1942 blues who had missed out on the first edition should take their opportunities to buy this one. (For its 2004 Awards, ARSC recognized the first edition as a nominee in the category of Best Research in Record Labels or Manufacturers.) Throughout its 15-year activity Paramount Records was a crass operation. In the eyes of grandparent company Wisconsin Chair, 78-rpm records ranked no higher than its other subsidiary companies in real estate, mining, oil, and natural gas. In the overall business scheme, the records were loss-leaders, serving as incentives for customers to buy the phonographs housed in cabinets built by Wisconsin Chair. Yet at the height of Paramount's sales during the 1920s, more money was made from the records than from the cabinets. What distinguished Paramount from the other record labels of the 1920s were its rosters of blues and black sacred musicians. Through the mid-1920s, the African American scout and producer Mayo Williams shepherded to Paramount the cream of musicians playing in Chicago, whether on the T.O.B.A. circuit, or in local venues like the Monogram Theater. Among the very best of this period were Ethel Waters, Alberta Hunter, Ma Rainey, Joe Oliver with Louis Armstrong, and Lovie Austin and her Blues Serenaders. Wisconsin Chair also maintained offices for its New York Recording Laboratories in New York, Port Washington WI, and Washington DC, and it made frequent use of the Gennett recording facility in Richmond, Indiana. By and in 1929, Paramount's circumstances were changing drastically: Williams left, his work taken over by Arthur Laibley; male rural singers like Blind Lemon Jefferson were outselling the female urban singers; and Wisconsin Chair opened its own recording studio on its Grafton, WI premises. While legendary now among record collectors and blues fans, the last 3 years of recording (1930-1932) were at the time the most desperate for Paramount, who was trying to see if the names of southern artists like Geechie Wiley and King Solomon Hill sounded exotic enough to the public to generate one more hit. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".