'Bunyan and the Dissenting Tradition' - the Sixth Triennial Conference of the International John Bunyan Society, University of Keele, UK, 26-28 July 2010
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I always look forward to this conference; few academic societies are as welcoming and warm as the International Bunyan Symposium. Jim Forrest, who had for so many years imagined such a society, would have been very pleased to see such a congenial gathering of scholars - including many of his own students - from so many places and disciplines. For its triennial conference, the Society met at the University of Keele, Staffordshire, England, for two days' discussion on the theme of 'Bunyan and the Dissenting Tradition'. Roger Pooley, the President of the Society, was our kind host from 26-28 July 2010.The four plenary sessions took us through evangelical adaptations, a theology of violence, a post-secular reading, and a panel on teaching Bunyan. The conference opened with a presentation by Isabel Rivers, Queen Mary University of London, a particular pleasure for those of us whose introduction to the Renaissance came from her Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry. She spoke on ''The Pilgrim 's Progress in the Evangelical Revival', exploring editions and adaptations of Bunyan' s allegory by John Wesley, John Newton, and others. It is in those adaptations, she argued, that we can detect not just attitudes towards Bunyan but the history of evangelism itself. The University of Leicester's John Coffey presented the second plenary on 'Bunyan and Violence.' There we heard about the peaceful man whose work rings with violence and violent metaphor. Although the conventional notion is that violence in The Pilgrim 's Progress is almost a distraction from its purpose, Coffey argues that that violence is actually necessary to an understanding of Bunyan' s theology. I was especially energized by the panel presentation on teaching Bunyan, which suggested that whether we teach at large institutions or small, public or private, we share both the challenges and the rewards of helping undergraduates discover Bunyan's work. Nigel Smith (Princeton, chair), Dan Runyon (Spring Arbor), Peter Hinds (Plymouth), and Maxine Hancock (Regent College, Vancouver) each shared experiences of teaching Bunyan in a variety of course settings and levels. We closed the conference with an inspiring and provocative talk by Lori Branch from the University of Iowa, author of Rituals of Spontaneity: Sentiment and Secularism from Free Prayer to Wordsworth. She gave a loving reading of Bunyan, followed by, in her words, a 'manifesto' for a new post-secular criticism: a reading that neither completely rejects nor completely embraces faith.Of course, one can tell a good conference when it is intensely difficult to choose among concurrent sessions, as it was here. I heard Arlette Zinck (King's University College) and Maxine Hancock (Regent College, Vancouver) introduce us to questions of ageing in Bunyan and Baxter. Michael Davies (Liverpool) asked us to wonder, as we all called to mind the illustrations from various editions, which Bible Christian is carrying at the beginning of Pilgrim 's Progress. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,039 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».