'Bunyan and the Dissenting Tradition' - the Sixth Triennial Conference of the International John Bunyan Society, University of Keele, UK, 26-28 July 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I always look forward to this conference; few academic societies are as welcoming and warm as the International Bunyan Symposium. Jim Forrest, who had for so many years imagined such a society, would have been very pleased to see such a congenial gathering of scholars - including many of his own students - from so many places and disciplines. For its triennial conference, the Society met at the University of Keele, Staffordshire, England, for two days' discussion on the theme of 'Bunyan and the Dissenting Tradition'. Roger Pooley, the President of the Society, was our kind host from 26-28 July 2010.The four plenary sessions took us through evangelical adaptations, a theology of violence, a post-secular reading, and a panel on teaching Bunyan. The conference opened with a presentation by Isabel Rivers, Queen Mary University of London, a particular pleasure for those of us whose introduction to the Renaissance came from her Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry. She spoke on ''The Pilgrim 's Progress in the Evangelical Revival', exploring editions and adaptations of Bunyan' s allegory by John Wesley, John Newton, and others. It is in those adaptations, she argued, that we can detect not just attitudes towards Bunyan but the history of evangelism itself. The University of Leicester's John Coffey presented the second plenary on 'Bunyan and Violence.' There we heard about the peaceful man whose work rings with violence and violent metaphor. Although the conventional notion is that violence in The Pilgrim 's Progress is almost a distraction from its purpose, Coffey argues that that violence is actually necessary to an understanding of Bunyan' s theology. I was especially energized by the panel presentation on teaching Bunyan, which suggested that whether we teach at large institutions or small, public or private, we share both the challenges and the rewards of helping undergraduates discover Bunyan's work. Nigel Smith (Princeton, chair), Dan Runyon (Spring Arbor), Peter Hinds (Plymouth), and Maxine Hancock (Regent College, Vancouver) each shared experiences of teaching Bunyan in a variety of course settings and levels. We closed the conference with an inspiring and provocative talk by Lori Branch from the University of Iowa, author of Rituals of Spontaneity: Sentiment and Secularism from Free Prayer to Wordsworth. She gave a loving reading of Bunyan, followed by, in her words, a 'manifesto' for a new post-secular criticism: a reading that neither completely rejects nor completely embraces faith.Of course, one can tell a good conference when it is intensely difficult to choose among concurrent sessions, as it was here. I heard Arlette Zinck (King's University College) and Maxine Hancock (Regent College, Vancouver) introduce us to questions of ageing in Bunyan and Baxter. Michael Davies (Liverpool) asked us to wonder, as we all called to mind the illustrations from various editions, which Bible Christian is carrying at the beginning of Pilgrim 's Progress. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".