Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hernandez-Avila, Ines (Ed.), Reading Native American Women: Critical/ Creative Representations. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press, 2005. 275 pages. ISBN 0-7591-0372-0. US$29.95. Reading Native American Women is a welcome contribution to Native American Women's Studies. Its collection of essays, both scholarly and creative, covers a range of topics: past colonization and present colonialism, issues of politics, law, and sovereignty, the study of religion and the appropriation of Native spirituality, and the work of individual writers and artists. Native American Women's Studies is an emerging area of scholarship. Historically, the study of Indigenous peoples has been dominated by anthropology. In her contribution to the collection, Mary Churchill relates the experience of Hopi-Miwok writer Wendy Rose, who was required to pursue her study of American Indian literature in anthropology rather than in English or comparative literature. Native women, however, were long overlooked by anthropology. Churchill tactfully suggests that this neglect might be due to the limited opportunities of male anthropologists to observe and speak with Native women, but she also locates the source ofthat neglect in underlying epistemological reasonsan epistemology that Churchill then shows as informing her own discipline, Religious Studies. Other contributors also discuss the failure of academia to recognize the importance of Indigenous knowledge and the value of Native women's experience. In Personalizing Methodology: Narratives of Imprisoned Native Luana Ross draws a powerful parallel between two closed institutions: the prison and the university. She relates how, while preparing a qualitative rather than quantitative study of imprisoned Native American women, she increasingly identified with the prisoners she interviewed, thereby producing a self-styled Indigenous methodology that also made it suspect in the eyes of her fellow sociologists. They the objectivity and generalizability of my study. They question whether the prisoners were telling me the 'truth.' I wonder: What truth? Whose truth?... I feel small, brown, stupid, ugly. (56) Although Ross does not equate the constraints placed on her scholarship with those literally imposed on her imprisoned subjects, she concludes that Indigenous women are subjected to various forms of institutional violence. Reid Gomez likewise notes how the regulation of methodology coexists with the regulation of behaviour. As with most essays in Reading Native American Women, hers analyzes the continued presence of colonialism. Observing that Native American authors are still expected to distil! …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».