Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I have often been asked why I am writing a biography of Lionel Robbins. I usually reply, truthfully, ‘His family asked me to.’ But that is not the answer to the question I am being asked. The English economist Lionel Robbins (1898–1984) left his mark in several ways, in his own country and elsewhere. His legacy remains in at least three areas: the academic discipline of economics; UK domestic and international economic policy, especially in the Second World War; and the arts in Britain. He is most associated with the London School of Economics (‘LSE’ or ‘the School’ to its students and staff), whose Economics Department he headed for thirty years and built up to its preeminent position in British economics. To economists he is still known as the author of An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (1932 and 1935), which is one of the three most important methodological statements on economics, and the source of its famous definition, ‘Economics is the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.’ But he was always as much interested in economic policy as in economic theory, in what he called political economy as distinct from economic science. During the Second World War, he entered government service in June 1940 and became (1941–5) the head of the group of economists advising the coalition government under Winston Churchill. As well as helping to create the British total war economy, he was decisively involved in the preparation of the white paper, Employment Policy (1944), and in the creation of the postwar international economy – a major figure in the process by which the visionary ideas of John Maynard Keynes in Britain and Harry Dexter White in the USA became the Bretton Woods institutions: the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank – and in the notoriously difficult Anglo-American loan negotiations at the end of the war, which allowed Britain to participate in the new postwar economic order. He was also a lover of the visual and performing arts, who took advantage of his skills and opportunities to serve the arts in the management of the Courtauld Institute of Art, the National Gallery and the Royal Opera House in London. Although he became famous in the 1960s for the ‘Robbins Report’ of the Committee on Higher Education (1961–3), his contribution to the well-being of the arts in Britain has been longer lasting. According to the recent historian of the National Gallery (Conlin 2006, 184), ‘The economist Lionel Robbins was probably the greatest of the Trustees to serve in the last century’ and ‘arguably the most effective Trustee the Gallery ever had.’
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,519 | 0,373 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».