MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W976395 · doi:10.1007/bf00238277

Stanley Kubrick Drama and Shadows: Photographs 1945-1950

2006· article· en· W976395 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Mather

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMovie theaterDramaContext (archaeology)PhotojournalismArtEntertainmentArt historyVisual artsStudioComicsPhotographyLiteratureHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

STANLEY KUBRICK DRAMA AND SHADOWS: PHOTOGRAPHS 1945-1950 Edited by Rainer Crone London: Phaidon Press, 2005, 255 pp. While the critical literature on Stanley Kubrick's fiction films is fairly extensive, his documentary films and photojournalistic career remain relatively unknown. Kubrick's production during his five-year tenure at Look magazine includes over nine hundred published photographs. It is reasonable to assume that a closer examination of this considerable body of work may shed light on the aesthetic and ideological factors which shaped the development of Kubrick's artistic voice. The book under review is the end result of an important curatorial effort conducted since 1998 by the Iccarus group, based in Munich at Ludwig-Maximilian University's Institute of Art. Edited by Iccarus founder Rainer Crone, Drama and Shadows presents approximately four hundred photographs printed from the original Look magazine negatives stored at the Library of Congress and at the Museum of the City of New York. The photographs are organized into thirty-one photographic stories and divided into four chapters (Metropolitan Life, Entertainment, Celebrities, and Human Behavior). To provide a critical context for the photographs, Crone and fellow Iccarus members Petrus Schaesberg and Alexandra von Stosch have each written a scholarly essay, in addition to brief introductory texts for the thirty-one photo-stories. Studies of Kubrick's cinema generally make only passing references to his training as a photographer, for reasons which may range from an auteurist prejudice against the collaborative and commercial natures of photojournalism and the authorial impurity of assigned work, to the fact that back issues of Look magazine and the original negatives and contact sheets were not easily accessible. One exception is Vincent LoBrutto's 1997 biography of Kubrick, which devotes roughly fifty pages to Kubrick's years at Look magazine. Prior to publishing Drama and Shadows, the Iccarus group had produced a traveling exhibit and a book of photographs published in 1999 by Schnell & Steiner. Entitled Stanley Kubrick: Still Moving Pictures, Fotografien 1945-1950, this volume includes essays in German not found in Drama and Shadows. Crone and von Stosch also co-authored an article (not included in Drama and Shadows), which was translated into English for the catalogue published in connection with the summer 2004 Stanley Kubrick exhibit at the Deutsches Filmmuseum in Frankfurt. An in-depth critical assessment of the photographs in this attractive volume may have important implications for Kubrick scholarship. In the book's Foreword, Crone modestly issues a disclaimer by stating that the book does not seek to make connections between Kubrick's photographic style and his movies. Not surprisingly, however, the authors of the critical articles cannot help but discuss Kubrick's films on several occasions, in addition to which the art historical and ideological contexts which they provide will undoubtedly assist film scholars in establishing relevant links between the filmmaker's photoessays, documentary shorts, and feature films. For example, Schaesberg links three key texts that constitute a visual and thematic focal point of Kubrick's early career, namely the dramatic aspects of boxing. Although Schaesberg doesn't engage in the comparative textual analysis himself, he points to a 1949 photoessay entitled Prizefighter, the 1951 documentary short Day of the Fight, and scenes from Kubrick's 1955 feature film Killer's Kiss. The focus on boxing demonstrates a consistent use of narrative, rhetorical and visual tropes that can be shown to originate in Look magazine's photojournalistic methods. The Iccarus group's art-historical perspective tends to highlight certain features at the expense of others. Two issues in particular arise from the group's underlying philosophy of an: the nature of Kubrick's Look photographs as a corpus and the types of influences considered worthy of analysis. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,098

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0290,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesMême sujetLiterature, Film, and Journalism AnalysisTravaux en français237 207