Effect of sire, age at first calving, season and year of calving and parity on reproductive performance of Friesian cows under semiarid conditions in Egypt.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to study some factors affecting reproductive performance of a locally-born Friesian herd in Egypt. Data of 2096 reproductive records representing 482 Friesian cows daughters of 38 sires raised at the Dairy Unit of Milk and Meat Project of Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Egypt (located at the northern western part of the Nile Delta) between 1985-2002 were utilized to study the effects of sire of the cow, age at first calving (AFC), season and year of calving/birth and parity on period from parturition to first service (FSP), days open (DO), calving interval (CI), number of services per conception (NSC), AFC and breeding efficiency (BE). The least squares mixed model analysis by SAS (1999) indicated that the overall least squares means (± standard error) of FSP, DO, CI, NSC, AFC and BE were 88.4 ± 1.1, 130.7 ± 1.9, 403.1 ± 1.9 days, 2.1 ± 0.1 services, 30.7 ± 0.1 months and 90.1 ± 0.6 %, respectively. Sire had highly significant (P<0.01) effect on DO, CI, NSC and AFC, but had insignificant effect on FSP and BE. The influence of AFC on FSP was highly significant (P<0.01) and not significant on DO CI, NSC and BE. Cows had AFC more than 36 months had the longest FSP (92.6±4.5) and cows had AFC less than 29 months of age had 87.8±2.7 days FSP. Season of calving had significant effect on FSP (P<0.01), DO and CI (P<0.05), but had insignificant effect on NSC. Season of birth had no significant effect on both AFC and BE. Cows calving in autumn had the shortest CI (394.3±4.7 days) comparing with those calved in other seasons (ranged between 404.8±6.5 and 409.4±5.2 days). Cows calving in autumn also had the shortest DO (122.6±4.8 days). Year of calving/birth had significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01) effect on all traits studied. A decreasing efficiency in reproductive performance of cows was observed over time. The shortest FSP and DO were in the period 1988 to 1990 (64.3±5.3 and 98.1±8.9 days, respectively) and the longest were in the period 2000 to 2002 (107.5±5.2 and 188.1±8.8 days, respectively). Calving interval increased from 371 days in 1988-1990 to 450 days
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".