Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 IntroductionWe present new Static Symmetry-Breaking Inequalities (SSBI) [11,6] for theproblem of packing equal circles in a square [9]. The new SSBIs provide amarked computational improvement with respect to past work [1], though notyet at the level where a purely Mathematical Programming (MP) based spatialBranch-and-Bound (sBB) can be competitive with a Branch-and-Bound (BB)“boosted” by combinatorial and geometrical devices such as [9]. We considerthe following formulation of Circle Packing in a Square (CPS) problem:given N ∈ N and L ∈ N, can N non-overlapping circles of unit radius be ar-ranged in a square of side 2L? This is equivalent to the more usual formulationwhere one maximizes the number of non-overlapping circles of unit radius in asquare of side 2L with L ∈ Q
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it