TOWARDS A RECOGNITION OF BEING: TOMSON HIGHWAY'S KISS OF THE FUR QUEEN AND EDEN ROBINSON'S MONKEY BEACH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste ensayo realiza un analisis de dos novelas recientes de autores nativos canadienses, Tomson Highway, el dramaturgo nativo mas conocido en Canada, y Eden Robinson, una joven escritora de British Columbia. Se analizan las novelas como textos hibridos que operan en la dislocacion entre las culturas nativas y la educacion y los modelos literarios blancos. Ambos novelistas realizan complejos ejercicios de traduccion transcultural, y el analisis se centra en como usan los generos europeos para conseguir sus propios objetivos, para reivindicar una tradicion cultural propia y reconstruir la identidad nativa. El ensayo reconoce la calidad y el valor de los terminos literarios convencionales blancos (de los que los autores son muy conscientes), a la vez que subraya su potencial como critica social y aboga por un reconocimiento de las culturas aborigenes en el discurso canadiense cultural y nacional EnglishThis essay concerns two recent novels by Canadian Aboriginal writers, Tomson Highway, Canada’s best known Native playwright, and Eden Robinson, a young writer from British Columbia. These novels are discussed as hybridised texts, working across dislocations between Native cultures and white literary education and white fictional models. Both novelists are engaged in complex cross-cultural translation exercises, and the discussion focuses on adapting European genres for Aboriginal writers’ own purposes to reclaim Native cultural inheritances and to reconstruct Native identities. I am arguing for quality in conventional white literary terms (of which both writers are very conscious), while speaking about social inequality, and making a case for equality in the recognition of Aboriginal peoples within contemporary Canadian cultural and national discourse
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".