Assimilation between two neighboring time intervals marked with tactile stimuli
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine whether and how the perception of an empty time interval marked by two brief tactile stimuli, S, is influenced by the duration of the preceding time interval, P. In each trial, three electric pulses, each lasting 20 ms, were successively delivered to the right hand of participants, the first two pulses marking P and the last two marking S. S was fixed at 240 ms while P was 160, 240, or 320 ms. In addition, there was a control condition where S was presented in isolation (without P). Perceived duration of S was estimated with the method of constant stimuli. Results showed that participants underestimated S when P was 160 ms. This underestimation appeared as a kind of perceptual assimilation between P and S, but indeed S was not overestimated when it was preceded by a longer interval (P = 320 ms). The underestimation was rather regarded as the time-shrinking illusion which had been tested with visual and auditory stimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it