MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W100970349

Addressing smoking during pregnancy:The challenge to start from the woman's view

2004· dissertation· en· W100970349 on OpenAlex
Agneta Abrahamsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsCentre for Family Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancySmoking cessationMedicinePopulationFamily medicineDemographyPsychologyEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this thesis has been to increase understanding on the process of smoking cessation during pregnancy from the perspective of learning. The smoking pattern before and after pregnancy related to health, Sense of Coherence (SOC) and social issues was studied among all pregnant women in south-east Skåne during the period March 1994 to August 1995. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire during the first visit to antenatal care and to answer some short questions in an interview after pregnancy. The critical point for change in smoking was when the woman became aware of her pregnancy. Women who were smokers at the time of conception declined from 30.9% to 19.3% at the time of the first visit to antenatal care. Depending on their smoking habits, the women were categorised as Non-smokers, Quitters, Decreasers, Relapsers and Continuers. In a general population the level of SOC was lower than among these pregnant women, which indicates a high level of motivation for change. Smoking and smoking cessation were related to different symptoms of ill health. Women who did not succeed in stopping smoking early in pregnancy were more often susceptible to the influence of life circumstances on smoking. However, success in stopping smoking increases self-esteem and could therefore be a way to improve self-efficacy and health in general. Pregnant and post-pregnant women’s ways of making sense of smoking during pregnancy were studied in an interview study of 17 women. A general feature amongst all women was that being a smoker and pregnant constituted shameful behaviour. Five different story types were illustrated: Smoking could be justified, Will stop smoking later, My smoking might hurt the baby, Smoking is just given up and Smoking must be taken charge of. Dialogue from a salutogenic perspective sees woman’s wish to give her children a smoke-free start in life. The woman’s way of constructing knowledge about smoking can in this way be seen as a point of access for health education. Hearsay, personal experiences and scientific facts of the dangers of smoking were interwoven with issues of well-being and social circumstances. Midwives’ ways of making sense of how they approach women who smoke were studied in interviews with 24 midwives. The story types Avoiding, Informing, Friend-making and Co-operating illustrated difficulties in changing from being an expert who gives information and advice to being a facilitator. It is suggested that health education should build on co-operation and dialogue about the smoking issue. The woman’s learning should be focused on, as she is the one who should talk and learn. The midwife’s role is to facilitate for the woman’s learning which means that she mostly listens to the woman’s view of smoking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it