MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1011599959

Le principe de liberté académique dans l’ére du conservatisme et de la globalisation. Parcours des libertés civiles et universitaires en Amérique du Nord (The Principle of Academic Freedom in an Era of Conservatism and Globalization...)

2007· article· fr· W1011599959 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Rangel

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUME. Les universites et les institutions educatives ont ete, depuis des siecles, confrontees a diverses contraintes d’ordre politique et religieux. Ainsi la liberte universitaire a prouve etre au cours des siecles, une condition essentielle pour les fonctions primaires des universites et des institutions educatives en general, comme la recherche et l’enseignement. Cette liberte rend possible l’esprit critique propre aux institutions universitaires et aux libertes civiles des societes democratiques. Ces institutions ont absolument besoin d’une liberte de facon a pouvoir accomplir leur mission sociale. L’article presente un bref survol historique de l’evolution et des acquis des universites a l’egard de la liberte academique. Ceci montre la valeur d’une des fonctions essentielles de l’universite : a savoir l’exercice de la critique. L’article expose des reflexions sur les contextes et situations dans lesquels la liberte academique est compromise dans l’ere de la mondialisation. D’une part, certaines compagnies qui commanditent les recherches risquent de limiter la liberte des chercheurs. D’autre part, la liberte academique compose a l’heure actuelle avec les pretendues politiques antiterroristes, notamment aux Etats-Unis. The principle of Academic Freedom in an Era of Conservatism and Globalization. Evolution of civil and academic liberties in North America ABSTRACT. For centuries, universities and other educational institutions have been faced with political and religious constraints. Academic freedom has proved, over time, to be an essential condition for the fundamental roles of universities, such as research and teaching. This freedom makes possible the critical spirit of universities and the civil liberties of democratic societies. Universities need freedom in order to accomplish their social mission. A brief historical overview of the evolution of academic freedom is presented, and the value of one of the essential functions of universities, the exercise of the “critique,᾿ is demonstrated. In addition, contexts and situations in which academic freedom is compromised in the globalization era are explored. On the one hand, some corporate sponsors of research could limit researchers’ academic freedom; on the other, academic freedom is threatened by antiterrorist policies, particularly in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207