MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mutations in fibrillin‐1 leading to classical and neonatal Marfan syndrome cause differential protease susceptibilities and protein function

2010· article· en· W101312021 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dirk Hubmacher, Ryan Kirschner, G. A. S. Iyengar, Dieter Brömme, Rainer Bartels, Dieter P. Reinhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFibrillinProteasesMarfan syndromeMutantExtracellular matrixMicrofibrilMutationBiologyProteaseCleavage (geology)GeneticsCell biologyMedicineGeneBiochemistryInternal medicineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibrillin‐1 constitutes the backbone of extracellular matrix microfibrils, which are crucial for regulating elastic fiber biogenesis and TGF‐beta bioavailability. Mutations in fibrillin‐1 give rise to the Marfan syndrome (MFS) characterized by vascular, skeletal and ocular symptoms. To investigate molecular consequences of mutations causing severe neonatal or the milder classical form of MFS, point mutations from each group were introduced in recombinant human fibrillin‐1 fragments. Proteolytic susceptibility was probed with physiological and non‐physiological proteases. The mutant proteins harboring neonatal mutations were typically more susceptible to proteolytic cleavage than those with classic mutations. The cleavage sites were found both in close proximity and distant to the mutations, indicating structural changes and the exposure of cryptic cleavage sites. The group of neonatal mutations more severely affected the ability of fibrillin‐1 to interact with heparin/heparan sulfate, which plays a role in microfibril assembly. Fibroblasts attached less efficiently to the neonatal as compared to the classical mutant proteins. These results suggest new molecular pathogenetic concepts for MFS. In most cases the neonatal mutations resulted in more severe effects, and the biochemical variability correlates with the clinical variability observed in MFS. The work was funded by the Canadian CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207