Bibliographic record
Abstract
利用武汉(30°N，114°E)MF雷达2000年2月11日至25日，以及2月28日至3月13日的观测数据，研究中层顶(80-98km)区域冬季潮汐振荡及其共振相互作用．水平风场扰动的动态谱显示出在所有的观测高度上都持续存在很强的24h潮汐波动；偶尔也会出现较强的12h和弱的8h潮汐振荡，这说明在中纬地区的冬季，24h潮汐是中层顶区域主要的潮汐成分．潮汐振幅及其相关动能随时间的变化表明，在24h，12h和8h潮汐之间可能存在强的共振相互作用．另外，24h潮汐的相位随高度的增加呈现出明显的增加趋势，表明观测到的24h潮汐是向上传播的．由相位剖面计算出24h潮汐纬向和经向风场的垂直波长分别为45km和47km．其向下的相俯传播速席分别为1．88km／h和1．97km／h．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".