Leisure, Biculturalism, and Second-Generation Canadians
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis paper focuses on biculturalism, leisure, and it explores diversity within the leisure experiences of second-generation Canadians whose parents emigrated from South Asia. The participants' lives and leisure were shaped by their biculturalism—the way in which they identified as south Asian and Canadian, embracing and retaining aspects of their traditional South Asian culture, while adopting and adapting to the culture of the dominant Canadian society in which they were raised. The study found that leisure helped incorporate parts of both traditions and reconcile the differences between the two cultures by providing opportunities to draw the two sets of traditions together. This integration was accomplished by introducing family and ethnic friends to dominant group practices and likewise introducing dominant group friends into their traditional minority ethnic traditions. The longitudinal nature of the study provided a sense of the sequence of meaning making over a ten-year period.KEYWORDS: Biculturalismleisurelongitudinal qualitative researchsecond generation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it