MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1020534512 · doi:10.24385/lincoln.25163102

Goof proof [Images 33: the best of contemporary illustration - exhibition]

2024· article· en· W1020534512 on OpenAlex
Darren Diss

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionSubject (documents)SociologyVisual artsGuardianComputer scienceArtLibrary scienceLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illustrated work for Exhibition.Goof Proof (Title of work) Exhibition �Images 33 The Best of Contemporary Illustration 2009 �Images� provides a showcase of the most influential, innovative and prestigious contemporary British Illustration selected for the �Images� annual. Work is jury selected for the annual and exhibition (Maggie Murphy � Art Director, The Guardian & Richard Robinson � Art Director, Leo Burnett). A smaller number of works are selected for a national tour.The work selected was a commissioned and published illustration which appeared in �H- The Hotel Magazine� published by William Reed Business Media in June 2008.This work is part of a continued research directed towards editorial illustration. I�m interested in the role of the editorial illustrator and how different illustrators develop a strategic approach and structure, through their unique working process, in the development of an individual �voice�.When textual information is �given� to an illustrator rather than chosen by them, with a tendency to be diverse in subject matter and tone, it requires the editorial illustrator to establish a conceptual approach which is adaptable in terms of producing appropriate ideas. As such I�m concerned with the way this positions editorial illustration beyond mere visualisation and how a unique and recognisable �voice� is derived.Editorial illustration forms an important part of my academic work and is a fundamental part of the teaching and learning programme where the focus is on investigating and understanding creative responses to �given� textual information.Images 33 Best of British Illustration ISBN: 978-0955807688Output Venue: London College of Communication (Opening venue)Then work Included in Exhibition Tour:Piece Hall, Halifax 4 Oct 09 � 7 Nov 09Shire Hall, Staffs 14 Nov 09 � 3 Jan 10Birmingham University 6 Jan 10 � 8 Feb 10University Campus Suffolk 13 Feb 10 � 15 May 10Aberystwyth Arts Centre 22 May 10 � 4 July 10http://www.aoiimages.com/exhibition.htm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it