MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W102159653

On the Net : Dissecting on the Internet

2001· article· en· W102159653 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael OReilly

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissection (medical)Computer scienceAnatomyWorld Wide WebBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The art and science of the scalpel is learned through long hours of study and hands-on dissection. Starting with the lowly frog, students learn the basics of anatomy by practising on the real thing. But the Internet may change that. It now offers a “virtual” way to slice and dice everything from your favourite amphibian to the human body. One of the first sites developed was The Interactive Frog Dissection (teach.virginia.edu/go/frog/). Launched 7 years ago, it is aimed at high school level students and offers photos, illustrations and short videos of actual frog dissections. There are also some interactive sessions that ask the student to choose the right incision points. Staying with frogs, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has created The Virtual Frog Dissection Kit (www-itg.lbl.gov/frog). Students can interactively dissect a digital frog named Fluffy, create movies and play the Virtual Frog Builder Game. It challenges users to reconstruct a frog from the nerves up — a twist on the normal dissection process. But frogs are only one of the virtual creatures available for bloodless dissection. Students can also tackle the wonders of a cow's eye (www.exploratorium.edu/learning_studio/cow_eye/index.html) or delve into the marvels of a sheep's brain at the University of Scranton (academic.uofs.edu/department/psych/sheep/). The Berkeley High School offers whole-cat dissection (www.bhs.berkeley.k12.ca.us/departments/Science/anatomy/cat/index.html), while over at the Virtual Pig Dissection site (mail.fkchs.sad27.k12.me.us/fkchs/vpig/) students can cut into an electronic hog. Of course, the ultimate training ground for medical students is the human body, and the Internet serves up a wealth of virtual cadavers. The Virtual Autopsy at Leicester University (www.le.ac.uk/pathology/teach/va/) is aimed at the pre-clinical medical student. Pupils have 12 autopsies to perform, and are asked to determine the cause of death in each case. At the high end of these online offerings is the Visible Human Project at the National Library of Medicine (www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/). Developers here have been building a complete digital database of human anatomy since 1989. The result is a virtual male and female data set built from actual CT, MRI and cryosection scans. Access to the entire database requires a licence, but some online samples are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207