MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El camino de Damasco pasa por la Amazonía. Crónica de una conversión anunciada

2011· article· es· W102691975 on OpenAlex
José Antonio Giménez Micó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTropelías/Tropelías · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La novela de Mario Vargas Llosa El hablador (1987) es una parodia del discurso y la práctica antropológicos que se efectúa a través del tradicional procedimiento retórico de llevar hasta sus últimas consecuencias, y así reducir al absurdo, lo que Vargas Lloga denomina “conservacionismo” o “ecologismo cultural” de los indigenistas. El exemplum de que se vale Vargas Llosa para deslegitimar a todos aquellos que se atrevan a cuestionar la asimilación pura y simple de los pueblos indígenas a la cultura dominante consiste en poner en escena a un converso, a un santo, a un iluminado: es decir, a un personaje tan “emocional”, “irracionalmente” obcecado por la desterritorialización a que se ven sometidos los machiguengas que, en lugar de abogar por su “conversión” a la “modernidad” o, al menos, de llegar a la “razonable” conclusión de que ésta es inevitable, termina él mismo “convirtiéndose” –en el sentido literal, místico del término– a su mundo “primitivo”. La reducción al absurdo operada en El hablador hace que la actitud del personaje epónimo, su quijotesco comportamiento, aparezca tan radical que incluso el lector que sienta simpatía hacia este personaje estará prácticamente obligado a reconocer el carácter ilusorio de su empeño. Mario Vargas Llosa’s novel El hablador (1987) is a parody of anthropological discourse and practice. This parody is carried out through the traditional rhetorical tactic of carrying to its limits, and thereby reducing to absurdity, what Vargas Llosa calls indigenous “conservationism” or “cultural environmentalism.” In order to discredit those who dare question the pure and simple assimilation of indigenous peoples to the dominant culture, Vargas Llosa uses as exemplum the presentation of a converso, a Saint and a visionary: that is, a character so “emotional”, so “irrationally” blinded by the deterritorialisation the Machiguengas are faced with that, instead of advocating their “conversion” to “modernity” or, at least, coming to the “reasonable” conclusion that this conversion is inevitable, he himself ends up “converting” –in the literal, mystical sense of the word– to their “primitive” world. This reduction to absurdity is such that the attitude and quixotic behaviour of the eponymous character seems so radical that even the reader who feels sympathy towards him will be virtually forced to recognise the illusory character of his determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it