Moses, Adam and the glory of the Lord in Ezekiel the Tragedian: On the roots of a merkabah text
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation is an exposition of the kabod speculations in the exilic and Second Temple period with a central focus on vice-regent traditions, particularly as reflected in the throne scene in Ezekiel the Tragedian's Exagoge. It supports the hypothesis- advanced by Gerschom Scholem and revised by subsequent scholarship- according to which pseudepigraphic traditions about the kabod served as a foundation for the ma'aseh merkabah speculations of rabbinic documents. It also corroborates the proposals of, among others, Gilles Quispel, Ithamar Gruenwald, Pieter W. van der Horst, and Carl Holladay, that the throne vision in Exagoge is a testimony for the continuous transmission of the kabod speculations from biblical literature to pseudepigraphic accounts. It, however, challenges the prevailing understanding of this continuity and implicitly the traditional interpretation of the throne vision in Exagoge. It leads to a proposal that diverges from the prevailing opinion that the origins of the vice-regent traditions must be sought in the Second Temple development of angelology and disputes the general assumption that these traditions imply the appropriation of an angelic status. It is argued that the viceregent traditions, more inhomogeneous that commonly assumed, reflect equally diverse origins in the ancient Israelite conception of YHWH's court or entourage. This exclusive and hierarchized entourage incorporated in the preexilic and exilic period not only heavenly beings, but also humans, in extraordinary figures and human institutions at first and subsequently, within a democratizing priestly anthropology in the exilic period, in hunanity in general, which was portrayed as the replacement of YHWH's cultic statue. In this value humanity was associated with the kabod, the prolongation of the numinous value of the statue. The detailed analysis of the throne vision in Exagoge leads to the conclusion that the enthroned anthropomorphic identity, that Moses appropriates, evokes the iconic paradigm. The scene even implies anti-angelic (ideologically) or anti-angelomorphic (paradigmatically) polemics. This proposal challenges the prevailing identification of the enthroned anthropomorphic identity with God and the common readings of Moses' enthronement as prophetic consecration or transformation into an angelic being.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".