MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W103089670 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.6.a1060

The small intestinal maltase‐glucoamylase activity increases during the postnatal growth in pigs

2007· article· en· W103089670 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dale Lackeyram, Buford L. Nichols, Ming Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDigestive system and related health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJejunumChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyMaltaseSmall intestineIleumAmyloseEnzymeHydrolysisStarchBiochemistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small intestinal maltase-glucoamylase (MGAM) contributes to the starch digestion pathway in the small intestine. This study investigated ontogenic changes of MGAM in the hydrolysis of amylose along the longitudinal axis of the small intestine. Jejunal tissue was collected from pigs belonging to each of seven age groups (d 1, 4, 6, 12, 20, 28 and 70, n = 6) for MGAM enzyme kinetic experiments. The jejunum was divided into halves with the end closest to the stomach designated proximal (Px) jejunum and the other half designated the distal (Dt). Kinetic experiments of MGAM activity were conducted with six levels of purified amylose (0–100 μM) at 37°C and pH 6.0. On average postnatal growth increased (P<0.05) the MGAM maximal specific activity (Vmax: d 1, 2.11±0.02 to d 70, 5.51±0.09, nmol/mg protein.min, n= 36) by 161% and increased (P<0.05) the enzyme affinity (Km: d 1, 31.99±1.51 to d 70, 18.51±1.19, μM, n=36) by 42%. Additionally, the proximal jejunum had consistently higher (P<0.05) Vmax (d 70: Px, 8.00±0.04 vs. Dt, 3.01±0.03 nmol/mg protein.min, n= 36) and lower enzyme affinities (d 70: Km: Px, 24.96±0.0.51 vs. Dt, 12.06±0.88 μM, n=36). Thus, postnatal growth was associated with a dramatic increase in the maximal specific activity of MGAM for the hydrolysis of amylose in pigs. The maximal activity of MGAM was consistently higher but the enzyme affinity lower in the proximal than in the distal jejunum throughout the growth in the pig. Supported by OMAFRA of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicDigestive system and related healthFrench-language works237,207