Elemen Pembentuk Citra Kawasan Bersejarah Di Pusat Kota Malang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the image of an area needs to be done to find out the identity of the place. District of Klojen is an area that has a legacy of historic buildings and environment in the Dutch colonial era, therefore it is necessary to study the image of the District Klojen kawasan bersejarah.This study aims: (1) analyze the imageforming elements in the historic district based on the perception of residents Klojen District of Malang, and (2) analyze the factors that influence respondents in identifying the image-forming elements in the historic district Klojen. Malang resident perception is divided into three groups, ie community groups, students, and experts. The method are used descriptive analytical and evaluative analysis. Descriptive methods isused to analyze the elements of the image forming region, using mental maps and interviews. Evaluative analysis used to analyze the factors that influence respondents to identify the image of the historic district, and to review the typology of perception of the respondents use the gestalt theory. The results are (1) image of the historic downtown district that is Klojen still can’t properly captured by the inhabitants of the city of Malang, and the District Klojen still highlight the historic image, (2) factors that influence respondents' perceptions are internal factors and external. Typology of perception, internal factors and external factors had ties in identifying the image of the historic district. Key words: image, historic, gestalt theory, mental maps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it