MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W103353880

Automatic Enforcement of Security in Computer Networks

2007· article· en· W103353880 on OpenAlex
T. Mechri, Mahjoub Langar, Mohamed Mejri, Hamido Fujita, Yutaka Funyu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProcess calculusSecurity policyEquivalence (formal languages)Network security policyEnforcementNetwork securityComputer security modelProcess (computing)Computer securityNetwork Access ControlOperator (biology)Theoretical computer scienceSecurity serviceInformation securityProgramming languageCloud computing securityMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main issue of this paper is to propose a formal technique allowing to automatically configure a given network so that it will respect a given security policy. In other words, given a computer network N and a security policy Φ, we introduce a formal technique that automatically produce another network N' such that N' $\vDash$ Φ and N and N' behaves in an equivalent (with respect to a given de finition of equivalence) way. To that end, we define a new process algebra allowing to better specify and analyze monitored network. We also define an operator $\otimes$ that produce from an initial network N and a security policy Φ another version of the network, denoted by N $\otimes$ Φ, configured in such a way that the security policy is always respected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it