Propofol enhances the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in CA1 hippocampal slices of young and aged mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing age was shown to decrease the requirements for propfol. However, the mechanisms of ageing-induced potentiation of anesthetic actions have not been clearly explored. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of propofol on the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in hippocampal slices of young and aging mice. METHODS: Brain slices were prepared from C57BL6 male young (2 months) and aging (>12 months) mice. The dendritic field excitatory postsynaptic potential was recorded from the CA1 stratum radiatum using patch clamp electrophysiological methods. A bipolar concentric stimulating electrode was placed along the Schaffer collateral for othodromic stimulation. The effects of clinically-relevant concentrations of propofol were studied in the young and ageing mouse tissues. RESULTS: Propofol application increased the orthodromically evoked fEPSP produced in slices taken from young and older animals. A striking feature in the I/O relationship was the decreased enhancement of the fEPSPs by propofol in slices from older mice. A clinically relevant concentration of propofol, 10 µmol/L, showed more significant enhancement in amplitude and area under the curve (AUC) of fEPSP in young compared to tissues from older mice (amplitude: young (24.9 ± 3.4)%, old (4.6 ± 1.6)%; AUC young (30.6 ± 5.4)%, old (2.1 ± 1.7)%). There was no statistically significant difference between the paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) ratios calculated for the responses obtained in tissues from young mice. In slices from older mice, in the presence of 10 µmol/L propofol, PPF was decreased and returned to baseline after washout (baseline 1.21 ± 0.01, propofol: 1.16 ± 0.01). Bicuculline (15 µmol/L) blocked the enhancement of propofol on fEPSP in tissues from young and old mice. CONCLUSION: The fEPSP of slices from aging mice demonstrates diminished sensitivity to the enhancing actions of propofol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".