MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1034643971 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88124-0

10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88124-0

2000· article· en· W1034643971 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. G. Larrañeta

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyFisheryStock (firearms)Fish stockMarine fishFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyBiologyFishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main theoretical problem in marine fisheries research is the uncertainty surrounding recruitment. The relationship between the number of fertile eggs and the generation to which they give rise, normally called the >stock-recruitment relationship>, is a problem which embraces a wide variety of aspects, all of them included in marine ecology. In this work, the biological and ecological basics of the pre-recruit stages are dealt with first. There is a general negative exponential relationship between temperature and age of hatching in the planktonic eggs of fish; those which do not float hatch at an older age. There is also a negative exponential relationship on the one hand between the time of hatching and first feeding, and on the other with temperature. The importance of starvation and predation as factors discussed. Cannibalism does not seem to be a significant factor in compensatory mortality except in Peruvian anchovettas. Hypotheses concerning fluctuations in recruitment are reviewed. On short time scales, they are explanations of the success of feeding by pre-recruits due to hydrographic and meteorological causes. On longer time scales, they related variations in recruitment to geophysical, astronomical and climatic factors. Parametric models of the stock-recruitment (S/R) relationship are examined. The best way to introduce environmental factors is by linear regression. Ussing this regression, the amount of variance accounted for by the environmental factors can be studied. Contrary to what is generally accepted, the real instrinsic population parameter is density-independent, while the density-dependent will always be related to the environmental factors which determine the food density. The use of non-parametric models simplifies the study of S/R. All of them have the drawback that they ignore the ecological aspects of year class success. The physical factors (salinity, temperature, wind, etc.) are really >predictors> of the pre-recruit survival values. The geophysical and astronomical factors (nodal tides, polar motion, length of day, etc.) are predictors of the ecological conditions in a particular area. Possible consequences of the risk of greenhouse warming are examined. Alternation of species is a typical phenomenon in the pelagic environment. The principle cause is due to the adults of the dominant species feeding on the eggs and larvae of the secondary species. If the biomass of the dominant species is strongly reduced, by at least half, the secondary species eventually becomes dominant. A massive increase in pelagic species by predation on their eggs and larvae. The alternation of demersal species is less common. The classical collapse of a fishery begins with an enormous recruitment, low recruitment follows, biomass is drastically reduced, and the collapse is maintained if the species becomes sub-dominant. The magnitude of recruitment depends on the ecological conditions in which the pre-recruits develop, but also on the energy stored by the parents. Life-history strategies differ; in pelagic species growth is initially rapid, and variations in energy consumption are reflected in fecundity, but in demersal species variations in energy comsumption influence growth rather than fecundity. In semiparous species, post-spawning survival is sacrified.Different patterns of evolution of the S/R relationship in fish are described. The hypothesis of Shepherd & Cushing (1990) concerning the influence of stochastic processes on recruitment variability is only supported in a minority of the S/R patterns studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9910.994

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knit→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→