The Helping Relationship: Healing and Change in Community Context. [la Relation D'aide : La Guérison et le Changement En Contexte Communautaire]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meier, A., & Rovers, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Helping Relationship: Healing and Change in Community Context. [La relation d'aide : laguerison et le changement en contexte communautaire.] Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press. ISBN 978-0-7766-0730-6, 256 pagesABSTRACTThe Helping Relationship presents a variety of topics carefully chosen to give the reader compelling material related to helping clients. The authors represent a range of professions including psychology, psychiatry, and pastoral counselling. Together they offer insights based on original research, clinical experience, and personal theory. Topics key to psycho therapy include transference and counter-transference, supervision, and mentoring. The current trend toward manualized therapy and empirically supported treatments are discussed in the context of the helping relationship. Overall, The Helping Relationship provides a range of material related to the reason for the helping relationship: that is, to help the client.RESUMETheHelpingReUitionship [La relation d'aide] presente une gamme de sujets soigneusement choisis pour offrir au lecteur- un materiel interessant portant sur l'aide aux clients. Les auteurs sont issus de divers domaines professionnels, dont la psychologie, la psychiacrie, et le counseling pastoral. Ainsi reunis, ils proposent des pistes fondees sur la recherche originale, l'experience clinique, et la theorie personnelle. Parmi les sujets-cles en psychotherapie, citons le transfert et le contre- transfert, la supervision, et le mento rat. On y discute de la tendance actuelle vers la dierapie manualisee et les traitements a fondement empirique dans le contexte de la relation d'aide. Dans l'ensemble, The Helping Relationship propose un eventail de materiel portant sur la justification de la relation d'aide, a savoir arderle client.The general purpose of The Helping Relationship is to provide the reader with thoughtful material about the roles of the therapeutic relationship and therapeutic techniques along with other topics central to the therapeutic relationship. The book is composed of 10 chapters, each of which presents a topic about the therapeutic relationship.The editors are Augustine Meier, PhD, psychologist in private practice and professor emeritus (Faculty of Human Science«, Saint Paul University, Ottawa) and Martin Rovers, PhD, professor (Faculty of Human Sciences, Saint Paul University, Ottawa). Meier wrote two chapters and contributed to a third with Micheline Boivin, MA, a psychologist working with trai ? matized children and their parents in Gatineau, Quebec, and Mo Usa Meier, a PhD candidate in the clinical psychology program at the University of Ottawa. Other authors are Shelley Briscoe-Dimock, a certified counsellor and PhD candidate (Saint Paul University, Ottawa); Reverend Marsha Cutting, PhD, professor in pastoral care and counselling (Waterloo Lutheran Seminary, Waterloo, Ontario); John Dimock, MB CH B. Dip. Psycho., PRCPC, a psychiatrist in private practice and the Canadian Armed Forces; Kristine Lund, PhD, a professor in contextual theology and pastoral counselling at Waterloo Lutheran Seminary; Brad Morrison, D.Min., a minister ordained with the United Church of Canada and a member of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy; Tricia Schottler, PhD, a psychologist in Ottawa; and Lorraine Ste-Marie, D.Min., a professor in the Faculty of Human Sciences at Saint Paul University.The book begins with a description of the nature of helping others, whether informally - whereby neighbours rally together to help a community member - or more formally through psychotherapy. The context of helping relationships is presented with a historical overview of how helping others has changed over time, leading to the present mental health movement. This overview emphasizes how the helping relationship has also evolved.Chapter 1, The Therapeutic Relationship and Techniques: How Clients Bring about Desired Changes, is written by Augustine Meier. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".