MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deepening Democracy in Indonesia? Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada). By Maribeth Erb and Priyambudi Sulistiyanto (eds.)

2009· article· en· W10450860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Md. Moniruzzaman

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Discourse · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsPolitical scienceDemocracyPublic administrationPolitical economySociologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding the genetic determinants of intermediate quantitative traits, such as serum creatinine and urea, might aid in finding the determinants of disease phenotypes, such as renal failure, that are, in part, defined according to threshold values imposed upon such traits. We evaluated the association between common variation in the gene encoding angiotensinogen, AGT, and the serum concentrations of creatinine and urea in non-diabetic Canadian Oji-Cree. We determined genotypes of the AGT codon 235 polymorphism among 502 non-diabetic Oji-Cree. We used multivariate analysis of variance to identify significant determinants of variation in serum concentrations of creatinine and urea and of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We found significant associations between the AGT codon 235 genotype and serum concentrations of creatinine and urea (p = 0.017 and 0.049, respectively) and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.041). Compared with subjects with the other two genotypes, homozygotes for AGT T235/T235 had significantly lower serum concentrations of creatinine and urea and significantly higher mean systolic blood pressure. The findings suggest that the AGT T235 allele is a determinant of intermediate traits related to renal function in these aboriginal Canadians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual DiscourseSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207