Small-Volume Fluid Resuscitation for the Far-Forward Combat Environment: Current Concepts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemorrhage remains the primary cause of death on the battlefield in conventional warfare. With modern combat operations leading to the likelihood of significant time delays in air evacuation of casualties and long transport times, the immediate goals of the Army's Science and Technology Objectives in Resuscitation are to develop limited- or small-volume fluid resuscitation strategies, including permissive hypotension, for the treatment of severe hemorrhage to improve battlefield survival and prevent early and late deleterious sequelae. As an example, the U.S. Army has invested much effort in the evaluation of hypertonic saline dextran (HSD) as a plasma volume expander, at one tenth to one twelfth the volume of conventional crystalloids, in numerous animal models of hemorrhage. These studies have identified HSD as a potentially useful field resuscitation fluid. In addition, preliminary studies have used HSD under hypotensive resuscitation conditions, and it has been administered through intraosseous infusion devices for vascular access. This research suggests that many of the difficulties and concerns associated with fluid resuscitation for treating significant hemorrhage in the field can be overcome. For the military, such observations have important implications toward the development of optimal fluid resuscitation strategies under austere battlefield conditions for stabilization of the combat casualty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".