Research on Model of Harmony Sustainable Development between ECS and SRS: From Perspective of Resource Entropy/RECHERCHE SUR LE MODÈLE DU DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE HARMONIEUX ENTRE ECS ET DE SRS: DE LA PERSPECTIVE DE L'ENTREPIE DES RESSOURCES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Combining the theory of dissipative structure systems, resource entropy and stakeholder, the article gave the definition of Stakeholder Resource System (SRS), analyzed sustainable development model of Enterprise Complex System (ESC) from the perspective of resource entropy, as well as sustainable development model of stakeholder resource system. Finally, based on the above analysis, the article studied Harmony Sustainable Development model of ECS and SRS. Key words: Stakeholder Resource System; Enterprise Complex System; Resource Entropy; Harmony Sustainable Development Resume: En combinant la theorie du systeme de structure dissipative, l'entropie des ressources et les intervenants, l'article a donne une definition du systeme des ressources des intervenants(SRS), analyse a la fois des modeles de developpement durable du systeme complexe de l'entreprise(CES) du point de vue de l'entropie des ressources et des modeles de developpement durable du systeme des ressources des parties prenantes. Enfin, a part l'analyse ci-dessus, l'article a etudie egalement le modele du developpement durable harmonieux d'ECS et de SRS. Mots-Cles: systeme des ressources des intervenants, systeme complexe de l'entreprise, entropie des ressources, developpement durable harmonieux 1. FORWARD The chemical enterprises around Taihu Lake whose emissions did not meet standard were forced to close because of the outbreak of cyanobacteria events; ECS of Sanlu milk powder collapsed because of Melamine events. These enterprises have not been able to achieve sustainable development. The essence is that ECS is disloyal to stakeholder which provides exclusive resource. They discarded a large amount of scrap entropy to SRS, which is really beyond its ability of regeneration and purification, causing increased confusion of internal SRS, inducing mutation, leading to no sustainable development of SRS, consequently affecting the sustainable development of ECS. The study on sustainable development of SRS and ECS, harmony sustainable development of SRS and ECS is imminent. 2. DEFINITION OF SRS AND ECS Enterprise system is a complex system (CHEN, 2000). ECS is an integrated system consisted of human resources, financial resources, material resources, information resources and many other elements under a certain goal. It obtains all the necessary resources elements from resources environment which is used for production and operation activities, according to available market information, a variety of resource allocation methods such as physical, chemical or biological methods. It combines various resource elements together organically according to intended purpose, producing a product or service and delivery to the needs of the market, to meet the resource demand of user and human, and get profit (Figure 1). With the development of ECS management theory, Stakeholders problem has become an integral part of existing governance framework of ECS (OU, 2007). Stakeholders are those individuals and groups who take a certain amount of specific investments and assume a certain risk, whose activity can influence, even change the achievement of business goals, and can be influenced by processes of achievement of business goals (JJA & CHEN, 2003). Stakeholders can be divided into ECS internal stakeholders and external stakeholders. According to its properties, external stakeholders can also be subdivided into external social attributes stakeholders and external natural attributes stakeholders (Figure 2). Resources are the material basis for existence and development of human beings and human organizations. Stakeholders provide proprietary resources for ECS, one of human organizations. SRS is the system to provide proprietary resources for ECS, with system characteristics, including internal stakeholders resources subsystem of ECS, external social attributes stakeholders resources subsystem of ECS, external natural attributes stakeholders resources subsystem of ECS (Figure 3). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".