<i>Saharan Jews and the Fate of French Algeria</i>, by Sarah Abrevaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saharan Jews and the Fate of French Algeria, by Sarah Abrevaya Stein. Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press, 2014. xv, 261 pp. $85.00 US (cloth), $27.50 US (paper). In the early 1960s, a team of anthropologists introduced the Western world to the hidden Jews of the Algerian Sahara. They described primitive tribes, untouched by modernization. Tribesmen had traditional occupations, like metallurgy, and they lived in deplorable conditions. Women engaged in unusual childbirth rituals. These tribes were said to trace directly back to Moses. For years following their emigration in 1961, prior to Algerian independence in 1962, even well-meaning conversations about this group focused on their ill-preparedness for the modern world. Jewish experience in the M'zab was neither as rigid nor as pristine as it seemed. Under the years of French colonial rule, a legal barrier kept Jews out of the polity; Saharan Jewish communities were in fact adaptable and eager to modernize. Saharan Jews and the Fate of French Algeria is a book about how these people were constricted, policed, and monitored. In fact, Sarah Abrevaya Stein argues that the very concept of their indigeneity was a French innovation. Jews were targets of the French colonial strategy to divide and rule--to segregate natives to manage the territory. Administrators elevated the status of Northern Algerian Jews, judging them to be closer than others to European lifestyles. Stein's book tells a lesser-known story about the Jews of the southern Algerian territories. Governed by a military administration, these people were not only restrained from the benefits of citizenship, they were also restricted from travel, medical care, and modern education. In 1882, the French annexed the Saharan territory as a protectorate, not an integrated departement as in the north. (Jews from Northern Algeria were naturalized in 1871.) Over the next eighty years of French governance, the administration denied Southern Jews the privilege of citizenship. The administration left behind a paper trail of justifications for this discrepancy between north and south. This archival material forms the basis of Stein's research. Saharan Jews were exempt from taxes, state registries, and military service, and they could neither vote nor attend public schools. They were governed by so-called which permitted them to engage in polygamous marriages, and allowed uncomplicated divorce proceedings. Colonial administrators reasoned that Southern Jews would live according to the Torah instead of French civil law. Although some bureaucrats suggested that Mosaic Law preserved cultural freedoms, Stein argues that it euphemized a negative legal identity (p. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".