Graves' exophthalmos: Volumetric assessment of orbital expansion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Graves' ophthalmopathy is characterized by an increase in the volume of orbital soft tissue contents and an associated increase in intraorbital pressure. Surgical expansion of bony orbital volume is therefore an effective method of treating moderate to severe exophthalmos. Numerous correlations between specific decompression procedures and reduction of proptosis have been made. The main emphasis of the majority of these studies, however, appears to be of a qualitative nature rather than quantitative. OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively examine the consequences of surgical orbital decompression in the treatment of severe Graves' exophthalmos, with respect to changes in ocular globe projection and orbital soft tissue and bony volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A series of three patients (five orbits) with severe exophthalmos were evaluated. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon using a standard technique of orbitozygmatic osteotomy in conjunction with three-wall orbital decompression and release of periorbita. Data obtained from standardized preoperative and three-month postoperative computed tomography scans were transferred to an offline computer workstation. Scalar and volumetric parameters were quantitatively analyzed to determine changes in globe projection in relation to intraorbital volume differences. RESULTS: Following surgery, mean globe retrodisplacement from the lateral orbital rim and from the optic foramen were 6.7 mm and 3.3 mm, respectively. Osteotomy and decompression were effective in producing an 18.6% increase in bony orbital volume. However, the volume of intraorbital soft tissues increased substantially following surgery, with a 23.4% increase in orbital fat volume and a 12.2% increase in neurovascular tissue volume. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of globe retrodisplacement achieved by surgical expansion of the bony orbital cavity in patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy may be less than anticipated, due to a post-operative increase in the intraorbital soft tissue volumes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".