MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase I study of reolysin given intravenously to patients with advanced malignancies

2006· article· en· W107421448 on OpenAlexaff
L. Vidal, Hardev Pandha, J. Spicer, Kevin J. Harrington, Susan L. Allen, David P. Leader, Matthew Coffey, Bruce Thompson, Stuart Kaye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChillsViral sheddingAntibodyToxicityGastroenterologyImmune systemInternal medicineImmunologyVirologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3064 Background: Reovirus is a double-stranded RNA virus with minimal pathogenicity in humans that selectively replicates in cells with activated Ras. Activated Ras inhibits the anti-viral effects of double stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR). Reovirus serotype 3 Dearing has selective antitumor activity, in vitro and in tumour xenograft models. Methods: Reolysin was administered as a 1-hr IV infusion every 4-weeks initially for one day; then 3 days then 5-days every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 1×108 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) increasing in successive cohorts until observation of drug-related toxicity ≥ grade 2. Endpoints were safety, viral replication, viral shedding, evaluation of immune response and antitumor activity. Results: 24 patients (pts) (median age 60; ECOG 1, 16 males) have been entered into the first 7 cohorts at the following dose levels: 1×108 for 1-day, 1×108 for 3-days and 1×108, 3×108, 1×109, 3×109 and 1×1010 TCID50 for 5-days. A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been reached and no dose-limiting toxicities have been observed. Toxicities have been mild (grade 1 or 2) and have included chills, fever, headache, runny nose, fatigue and myelosuppression. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) studies of blood, urine, stool and sputum post reovirus administration were negative for viral shedding for all treated pts. All but one pt had neutralising anti-reovirus antibodies detectable pre-treatment. Titres increased after 1-week of treatment and remained high during subsequent courses of treatment. Two pts with metastatic colorectal cancer treated at 3×108 and 3×109 TCID50 had CEA tumour marker reduction by 60% and 27% receiving 6 and 3 courses of treatment respectively. One pt with metastatic pancreatic cancer received 4 courses of treatment with stable disease. One pt with metastatic prostate cancer had a 50% decrease in PSA after treatment at 3×109 TCID50, with evidence of tumor necrosis on CT scanning. Intratumoral reovirus replication has been detected by electron microscopy in tumur biopsies. Conclusions: Reolysin is well tolerated with minimal toxicity. No viral shedding has been detected. Virus-induced tumor necrosis associated with intratumor viral replication after systemic delivery has been observed. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207