Notes on Cuban Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: lchneumonidae), with the description of two new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge of the Cuban Pimplinae (Ichneumonidae) is updated, based on a partial revision of the country's collec- tions. Although the information is far from complete, 15 genera and at least 38 species are recorded, which almost doubles the figures in Alayo's Cuban catalogue (1973) and renders the Pimplinae the second largest subfamily of Cuban ichneumonids. Two new species (Zatypota bayamensis Fernandez sp. nov. and Schizopyga anseli Fernandez sp. nov.) are described from genera found for the first time in the Caribbean islands. Notas sobre los Pimplinae de Cuba (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), con descripcion de dos especies nuevas. Resumen: Se actualiza el estado de conocimiento de la subfamilia Pimplinae (Ichneumonidae) en Cuba, a partir de una revi- sion parcial de las colecciones del pais. Aunque la informacion es todavia preliminar, se registran 15 generos y al menos 38 especies, lo que coloca a los pimplinos como la segunda subfamilia mas grande de icneumonidos de Cuba y casi duplica las cifras del catalogo de himenopteros cubanos de Alayo (1973). Se describen dos especies nuevas (Zatypota bayamensis Fer- nandez sp. nov. y Schizopyga anseli Fernandez sp. nov. ) en generos encontrados por primera vez en el Caribe insular. Palabras clave: Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae, nuevas especies, Cuba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".