MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1086713596 · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00140

Molecular Interactions in Organic Nanoparticles for Phototheranostic Applications

2015· review· en· W1086713596 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kenneth K. Ng, Gang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. ArmyTerry Fox FoundationOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationProstate Cancer CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsCitationSocial mediaLibrary sciencePharmacyAltmetricsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTMolecular Interactions in Organic Nanoparticles for Phototheranostic ApplicationsKenneth K. Ng†∥ and Gang Zheng*†‡§∥View Author Information† ‡ § †Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, ‡Department of Medical Biophysics, and §Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S, Canada∥ Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 19, 11012–11042Publication Date (Web):August 5, 2015Publication History Received9 March 2015Published online5 August 2015Published inissue 14 October 2015https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00140Copyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSACS AuthorChoiceArticle Views17220Altmetric-Citations397LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (22 MB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Conjugated polymers,Dyes and pigments,Fluorescence,Molecules,Nanoparticles Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations600
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207