Executive Summary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Less than one-fifth of the people in the world who are diagnosed with diabetes receive the level of care required to maintain optimal health and quality of life.With the incidence of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes increasing at an alarming rate, this is a distressing statistic.Despite the existence of effective national and international guidelines, too few children achieve the appropriate levels of care.Effective diagnosis and care for children with diabetes is no less than mandatory.Diabetes care for youth must be compliant with the United Nation's ''Convention on the Rights of the Child'', wherein it is recognized that the child is entitled to ''enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health and to facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation of health''.This document addresses key aspects of diabetes, its care and the costs of care in youth under the headings of Epidemiology; Organization of Care; Psychosocial Aspects; and Socioeconomic Aspects.The authors' goals are to create a Ôstandard of care' which, although dependent on local and national potential and possibilities, serves as a benchmark for improved care to children and adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.344 | 0.326 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".