MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W111322625 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2007.028

Trophic Status Evaluation for 154 Lakes in Quebec, Canada: Monitoring and Recommendations

2007· article· en· W111322625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsWatershedTrophic levelSecchi diskWater qualityEnvironmental scienceTransparency (behavior)Environmental resource managementGeographyGovernment (linguistics)Environmental monitoringEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental planningNutrientBusinessEutrophicationEcologyEnvironmental engineeringPolitical scienceComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Based on chlorophyll a, total phosphorus, transparency (Secchi disk), and total nitrogen, 154 lakes located in southern regions of the Quebec province were classified according to their trophic status. Various classification methods were presented and discussed. The evaluation of existing relationships among quality parameters were established, and suggestions for priority actions and restoration initiatives were given. The ‘Reseau de surveillance de lacs’ of the Ministère de développement durable, environnement et parcs is considered as a very successful program that should be increasingly supported by the government. The program meets sustainable development principles in watershed management. The results showed that although the majority of lakes surveyed were within optimal conditions (oligotrophic status), 22 lakes required closer surveillance and more effective nutrient control measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it