Mother-Daughter Feminism and Personal Criticism in Isabel Allende's "Paula"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesar de ser la escritora hispana m?s exitosa de los ?ltimos a?os, la cr?tica tien de a catalogar a la chilena Isabel Allende como autora popular de escasos recur sos te?ricos. Tomando en cuenta la tendencia hacia la personalizaci?n de los es quemas te?ricos que Nancy . Miller llama criticism, este art?culo considera Paula texto en que Allende adopta una postura autobiogr?fica al ha blar de la enfermedad y muerte de su hija un ejemplo de dicha cr?tica personal en la que /a autora revela sus particulares nociones sobre el feminismo. Mi lectura explora la orientaci?n geneal?gica del contenido de Paula as? como su perspectiva narrativa, destacando la preferencia en ambos planos por las relaciones entre ma dres e hijas. Analiza, tambi?n, las implicaciones feministas de la diada narrato l?gica madre-hija que sostiene Paula, compar?ndola con la ret?rica narrativa de Las mil y una noches y la psicolog?a feminista contenida en el mito de D?meter y Pers?fone y sus ritos antiguos. Este acercamiento ayuda a perfilar las prioridades feministas del texto a la vez que cuestiona la perjudicial noci?n de que la ac cesibilidad narrativa y la formulaci?n de teor?as son actividades mutualmente excluy entes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".