MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 3009: Major Subgroup Analyses from the FINESSE Trial: Evaluation of Abciximab + Half -Dose Reteplase, Abciximab Alone, or Placebo for Facilitation of Primary PCI for ST Segment Elevation MI

2007· article· en· W111942868 on OpenAlexaff
Michał Tendera, Klinika I Katedra, Stephen G. Ellis, Ad J. van Boven, Mark de Belder, Gilles Montalescot, Petr Widimský, Luc Janssens, Henning Andersen, Jerzy Adamus, Jan Z. Peruga, Maciej Kosimder, Amadeo Betriu, Paul W. Armstrong, Bruce R. Brodie, Howard C. Herrmann, Elliot S. Barnathan

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReteplaseAbciximabClinical endpointConventional PCIST elevationPlaceboCardiogenic shockRandomizationRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionStreptokinaseAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Whereas primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy for acute ST elevation MI if performed promptly, treatment delays are common. Methods: We tested the hypothesis in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of 2452 subjects from 20 countries that early pharmacologic therapy with half dose reteplase and abciximab, followed by PCI would improve the outcome in ST elevation MI patients presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset with anticipated first medical contact to catheterization time of 1– 4 hours, relative to patients receiving abciximab at the time of primary PCI; with a third randomized arm of early abciximab to better evaluate the contribution of reteplase to the combination therapy. The primary study endpoint was a composite of all cause mortality, ventricular fibrillation beyond 48 hours, cardiogenic shock or heart failure requiring re-hospitalization or an emergency room visit within 90 days. A major secondary endpoint was % ST segment resolution (>70%) 60 –90 min after randomization. Final patient enrollment was completed December 30, 2006, and 90 day follow up results will be available fall 2007. Results: Enrollment demographics are as follows: mean age = 62 years (16% ≥75), 26% female, 10% Killip II-IV, 11% prior MI, 16% diabetics, 48% anterior MI and 61% enrolled ≤ 3h after symptom onset. The median times from symptom onset to randomization, and randomization to first balloon inflation by tertiles were 1.5, 2.6, and 4.4 hours and 1.2, 1.8, and 2.6 hours, respectively. Pre specified subgroup analyses for the primary and major secondary study endpoints included time from symptom onset to randomization (≥3 vs >3 hours), randomization time to first balloon inflation (by tertiles), Killip Class (I vs II-IV), gender, age (<75 vs ≤75 years), history of prior MI, diabetes, and anterior vs non-anterior MI. Conclusion: The findings from these analyses will supplement the primary study results from this, the largest randomized trial of facilitated angioplasty, to help define the proper management of this important group of high-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→