Abstract 434: Formin Dependent Regulation of Adherens Junction Assembly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adherens junctions are cadherin-dependent structures that mediate intercellular signaling and structural integrity. In endothelial cells, adherens junctions are the primary determiners of vascular permeability and endothelial barrier function. Adherens junctions connect directly to the actin cytoskeleton and this connection is essential for junction formation and maintenance. Formins are a highly conserved family of cytoskeletal remodeling proteins whose activity has been implicated in regulating junction formation in other cell-types. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that formin activity is essential for adherens junction assembly in endothelial cells. A small-molecule formin inhibitor (smiFH2) was used to determine the effect of formin inhibition on junction formation in Telomerase-Immortalized Microvascular Endothelial (TIME) cells. Using an in vitro vascular permeability assay, we determined that smiFH2 treatment caused a dose-dependent inhibition of junction formation. We used siRNA to knockdown expression of seven of the formins expressed in TIME cells in order to determine which specific formins were required to maintain endothelial barrier function. We determined that individual knockdown of three formins, FHOD1, FHOD3 and Dia1, significantly increased the permeability of the endothelial monolayer. Interestingly, the knockdown of a fourth formin, FMNL2, had the opposite effect and actually potentiated barrier function. Knockdown of the remaining formins had little or no effect on junction formation. Knockdown of FHOD3 had the greatest inhibitory effect on junction assembly and VE-cadherin, β-catenin and α-catenin protein levels were decreased in FHOD3-depleted cells. The FHOD3 knockdown cells were also elongated in comparison to controls and formed thin linear adherens junctions and few focal adherens junctions. In contrast, the morphology of FMNL2-depleted cells did not appear obviously different from controls. In conclusion, our results suggest that multiple formins play diverse roles in endothelial cell adherens junction formation and maintenance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".