MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W112144226

Continuous Therapeutic Ultrasound Decreases Pain Perception and Increases Pain Threshold After Muscle Damage

2012· book· en· W112144226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stacey E. Aaron

Bibliographic record

VenueScholar Commons (University of South Carolina) · 2012
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPain perceptionThreshold of painMedicineTherapeutic ultrasoundPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPerceptionAnesthesiaUltrasoundPsychologyNeuroscienceRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) is one of the most common treatment modalities used in the management of symptoms associated with delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). However, due to the lack of adequate research and poor study designs the ability to accurately determine if there is an effect on the perception of pain using continuous therapeutic ultrasound is not possible. Therefore, we conducted a randomized, double blind trial to try and determine the effect of repetitive continuous therapeutic ultrasound for the treatment of pain caused by muscle damage in the biceps brachii. Methods: Twenty young healthy participants (mean age, 24.05 ± 3.71) were randomly assigned to a control group (sham treatment) or TUS group (treatment). All subjects performed 50 maximal eccentric contractions in both arms on a Biodex dynamometer, but only the non-dominate arm was measured. Criterion measures of isometric force production and serum creatine kinase activity were measured at baseline and peak damage. Muscle soreness and pain were assessed at baseline before damage, 24 h post damage, 48 h post damage, and every other day until day 8. Muscle soreness/pain was assessed with a battery of tests: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), joint angle, and mechanical pressure threshold measured with an algometer. Results: Significant changes in the VAS (p=0.01) and algometer (p=0.015) were found after the third treatment of ultrasound in the distal region of the biceps. Significance (p=0.036) was seen in the overall timepoints of the distal region of the biceps at rest in the VAS scale, as well as significant change in mechanical pressure threshold (p=0.045) in the overall timepoints of the distal region. The means of the treatment group showed greater improvement from baseline than the placebo group for most variables at each measured time point. Conclusion: Continuous therapeutic ultrasound reduced perception of pain and increased mechanical pressure threshold in the biceps brachii after muscle damage was induced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholar Commons (University of South Carolina)Same topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207