Littérature québécoise et l’enseignement du français au Brésil: le cas NEC/UFF.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ao ressaltar o pioneirismo do NEC/UFF na realização de pesquisas científicas centradas na produção literária do Canadá francófono, o artigo apresenta reflexões sobre estratégias para o ensino do francês no Brasil. Revelando uma postura de amadurecimento político-ideológico, que sempre caracterizou as práticas acadêmicas desenvolvidas neste Centro de Estudos, seus autores propõem uma ação pedagógica fundamentada não apenas na recusa da alienação e da pulsão mimética, mas também na valorização da diversidade cultural em uma época em que se reconhece o nascimento de uma literatura-mundo em francês.Palavras-chave: Núcleo de Estudos Canadenses da UFF; políticas e práticas pedagógicas; ensino de francês e de literaturas do Canadá francófonoAbstract: This article presents french as a second language teaching strategies in Brazil, highlighting NEC/UFF pioneering research on French Canadian literature. It discusses the political and ideological evolution and maturing goals of the school’s academic practice. The authors propose pedagogy to counteract both alienation and mimetic impulse while striving for the recognition of cultural diversity and global French literature.Keywords: Centre of Canadian Studies of UFF; political and practice pedagogy; teaching french and French Canadian literatureRésumé: En soulignant le caractère pionnier du NEC/UFF dans la réalisation de recherches scientifiques centrées sur la production littéraire du Canada francophone, l’article présente des réflexions concernant des stratégies pour l’enseignement du français au Brésil. En dévoilant une posture révélatrice d’un mûrissement politico-idéologique, qui a toujours caractérisé les pratiques académiques développées dans ce Centre d’Études, ses auteurs proposent une action pédagogique fondée pas seulement sur le refus de l’aliénation et de la pulsion mimétique, mais aussi sur la valorisation de la diversité culturelle dans une époque où l’on reconnaît la naissance d’une littérature-monde en français.Mots-clés: Centre d’Études Canadiennes de l’UFF; politiques et pratiques pédagogiques; enseignement du français et des littératures du Canada francophone
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".