MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18984: Discrepancy Between Originally Assigned and Adjudicated Causes of Out-of-Hospital-Cardiac-Arrest of “No Obvious Cause” in Young Patients

2014· article· en· W1127152708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine S. Allan, Laurie J. Morrison, Jack V. Tu, Arnold Pintér, Matthew R. Common, Dhanisha Patel, Brian T. Nguyen, Cameron Landry, David Dorian, Paul Dorian

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyCause of deathCoronerPopulationEmergency medicineAutopsyProspective cohort studyCohortMedical emergencyPediatricsPoison controlInjury preventionInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Death due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is most commonly attributed to “no obvious cause” after review of the prehospital and in-hospital documentation. To establish cause of death in younger patients, autopsy and toxicology data are important, especially in younger patients. We examined the probable cause of death in a large urban cohort of younger OHCA patients. Methods: A prospective population-based registry of all OHCAs attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the Toronto area was used to identify cases from 2009-2012. Identified OHCAs were cases aged 2-45 who died and assigned ‘no obvious cause’ based on abstracted data from ambulance call reports and in-hospital chart review, including narrative review and contributing factors compliant with the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry Manual of Operations. Cases with inadequate information (coroners and/or EMS), or with expected death (e.g. DNR or long term care) or homicide were then excluded. The remaining cases were adjudicated by 3 reviewers using additional data from coroner investigative statements, autopsy, toxicology and police reports, and classified as primary cardiac or another non-cardiac etiology. Results: A total of 2048 OHCA cases with no obvious cause were identified; of these, 547 were excluded. Of the remaining 1501 cases with complete information, 48.2% were treated by EMS. Of the treated cases, 41.3 % (299/724) of those assigned to ‘no obvious cause’ had an adjudicated cardiac etiology. Of the untreated group, 21.2% (165/777) had an adjudicated cardiac etiology. The majority consisted of drug overdoses (214/425; 50.3%) and other non-cardiac causes (49.7%) including trauma (Figure 1). Conclusions: In younger OHCA patients who die, the category "OHCA of no obvious cause”, on detailed review, is most often due to a non-cardiac cause. This observation may contribute to a better understanding of the etiology of sudden cardiac death in younger patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→